Vladimir Solovyov, a prominent figure on state television who is known for promoting Kremlin viewpoints, has made alarming statements about the possibility of the UK being targeted in a hypothetical World War Three scenario. He suggested that supplying Tomahawk long-range missiles to Ukraine could trigger a global crisis similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. This provocative stance is part of a pattern of aggressive rhetoric directed at the UK by Solovyov.
The debate over supplying Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine has drawn attention from US President Donald Trump, who is contemplating the decision. Solovyov cautioned the West that any such action would provoke a response, especially if the recipient is Volodymyr Zelensky, who has been actively seeking these weapons. Both the US and Britain possess similar land attack missiles deployed on ships and submarines.
Solovyov emphasized the seriousness of the situation, comparing it to the Cuban Missile Crisis and warning that any aggression would result in catastrophic consequences. He controversially mentioned the potential targeting of the UK, suggesting that the destruction of the country would be met with approval from humanity.
In a provocative statement, Solovyov proposed that Putin should deploy the new nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile system in the UK, considering Britain as a key supporter of Ukraine against Russia. He urged Putin to make a bold move by recalling all Russian diplomats from Western countries as a prelude to potential military action.
Putin himself expressed concerns that supplying Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine would strain his relationship with Trump, potentially undoing the positive developments in their interactions. Putin emphasized the impact of such decisions on bilateral relations, hinting at the complexities involved beyond individual intentions.
The escalating tensions and rhetoric surrounding the Tomahawk missile issue highlight the delicate balance of power and relationships in the global arena, with potential consequences that could alter the course of international affairs.